HOME 정보검색 검색결과상세정보

Trade, Reform, And Structural Transformation in South Korea

2013-07-31

Caroline Bettsa | University of Southern California |
Rahul Girib | Instituto Tecnol´ogico Aut´onomo de M´exico |
Rubina Verma | Instituto Tecnol´ogico Aut´onomo de M´exico |

Munich : Munich Personal RePEc Archive

63 pages

http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/

초록

A two country, three sector hybrid model of structural change with distortionary government policies is used to quantify the impact of international trade and trade reform for industrialization. The model features Armington motivated trade in agriculture and industry, and a novel representation of trade reform as a time sequence of import tariffs, export subsidies and lump sum government transfers of net tariff revenue. We calibrate our economy to data on South Korea and the OECD, inputting time series of country and sector specific labor productivity, tariffs and export subsidies which determine evolution of the effective pattern of comparative advantage. The model’s predicted reallocations of Korean labor from agriculture into industry and services from 1963 through 2000 are quantitatively similar to those in the data. Incorporating trade and measured Korean trade reform are both important for the accuracy of this predicted structural change, although international real income differences under non-homothetic preferences primarily determine trade and specialization patterns rather than comparative advantage. Counterfactually eliminating a) international trade b) international labor productivity differentials c) post 1967 Korean tariff reform and d) post 1967 industrial export subsidy reform increase the model’s SSE by 91 percent, 56 percent, 27 percent, and 62 percent respectively.

목차

>> 1 Introduction
>> 2 Structural Change and Trade Reform in South Korea
>> >> 2.1 Growth
>> >> 2.2 Structural Transformation
>> 3 Model
>> >> 3.1 The Environment
>> >> 3.2 Households
>> >> 3.3 Firms and Production
>> >> >> 3.3.1 Varieties
>> >> >> 3.3.2 Government
>> >> >> 3.3.3 Final Goods
>> >> 3.4 Equilibrium
>> >> 3.5 Analysis
>> >> >> 3.5.1 Varieties
>> >> >> 3.5.2 Final Goods
>> >> >> 3.5.3 Households
>> >> >> 3.5.4 World Equilibrium
>> >> >> 3.5.5 Employment and GDP Structure
>> >> >> 3.5.6 Structural Change in the Open Economy
>> >> >> 3.5.7 The Pattern of Trade and Comparative Advantage
>> 4 Calibration
>> >> 4.1 Data Inputs
>> >> >> 4.1.1 Tariff and Subsidy Rates
>> >> >> 4.1.2 Labor Productivities
>> >> 4.2 Preference Parameters
>> >> 4.3 Trade Parameters
>> 5 Results
>> >> 5.1 Benchmark Open Economy Model Performance
>> >> 5.2 The Role of Non-Homothetic Preferences for Trade
>> >> 5.3 Counterfactuals
>> >> >> 5.3.1 Closed Economy Model
>> >> >> 5.3.2 Controlling for International Productivity Differentials
>> >> >> 5.3.3 Controlling For Trade Reform
>> 6 Conclusion

참고문헌

  • Eaton, Jonathan | Samuel S. Kortum (2002) , Technology, Geography, and Trade , Econometrica , VOL.70 No.5 , pp.1741 ~ 1779
  • Giri, Rahul (2012-01) , Local Costs of Distribution, International Trade Costs and Micro Evidence on the Law of One Price , Journal of International Economics , VOL.86 No.1 , pp.82 ~ 100
  • Matsuyama, Kiminori (2009-07) , Structural Change in an Interdependent World: A Global View of Manufacturing Decline , Journal of the European Economic Association , VOL.7 No.2-3 , pp.478 ~ 486